Wednesday, October 3, 2012

A Different Kind of Language


Rag / Jasper Johns

The Korean flag clearly has a background and foreground figures. 
The American flag has no background/foreground separation where the stripes are.  And where the stars are, the background is deep navy with white stars, reversing the traditional background color to be the color of the foreground figure making the reading fluctuate between positive (figures floating in the background space) and negative figures (navy blue surface punctured with star-shaped holes). 

- Our mind easily and eagerly turns anything we see into a spatial reading
- That is why it is not easy to draw "nothing" (having no antecedence, no reference to other things but itself). 
- Even when you leave a blank canvas, it "looks like" infinite space. 
- If you have a grid, as in the red and white stripes in the American flag, it is possible to draw nothing (no outside reference) and keep the mind in the here and now. 

- Structure is the visual common language. Without a common language, there are no seeing, hearing, perceiving, knowing, or understanding. Information cannot be delivered to the brain without language. 
- Structure of things is sort of a language in the sense that it lets us convey / receive information. 
- Structure of things is different from conventional language in the sense that it has no antecedence; it does not point to other things; it points to itself; it is self referential; it is. 
- We do use the mind's tendency to understand order (ex. Math) when perceiving structure. This does not mean structure is pointing to mathematical truth. No, mathematical truth is a tool that helps us understand structures such as a grid. 
- when we see a grid, we do not think of mathematical truths. No, quite the opposite. Mathematical truths help us see the grid and our mind stays where the grid is. 
- When we see a picture of something, say an apple, our mind is no longer on the paper. It has flown to the apple in someone's kitchen or a grocery store. But a true painting, with the composition and brushstrokes and colors and textures, puts the attention of a viewer onto the surface of the canvas and holds it there. The mind never leaves the canvas. The canvas has become a totally unique creation. 

The Right Kind of Questions

"Those who wish to succeed must ask the right preliminary questions."
ARISTOTLE, METAPHYSICS, II, (III), I.

"When a problem is properly stated, in our epoch, it inevitably finds its solution"
LE CORBUSIER, TOWARDS ARCHITECTURE

http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/en/mark_applebaum_the_mad_scientist_of_music.html

The wrong kind of questions focus on the appearance; they are superficial.  

- "What is music?"  "What is art?"  "What is democracy?" etc.
- "What's the answer?"
- "How do you fix this?"
- "How do we make more money?"

These questions are devoid of will and passion.  These questions only seek approval, but do not care for truth.  Because these questions do not think much of truth, there can be no life to these questions.  Answering these questions changes nothing.  The result is lifeless.

The right questions are directly related to who I am / we are:  our weaknesses, our desires, our passions, our vulnerabilities, our lives.  

- "Is it interesting to me?"
- "What do I really want?"  "Why do I want it?"  "Why do I like it?"
- "What will make me grow?"  "What is hindering my growth?"
- "What is the problem?"  "What is the need?"
- "What works?"  "What doesn't work?"
- "How should we spend our money?"

The right questions are interested in the true nature of things.  The true nature makes one feel naked, embarrassed, and vulnerable.  Yet, because it is true, it breathes life into everyday living.  And if one is alive, one shall grow.

http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/en/brene_brown_on_vulnerability.html